| Performance Indicators |
1. Overview
2. List of Indicators
3. Creating / Editing Performance Indicators
3.1 Performance Indicators Fields
4. Perspectives / Indicator Types
5. Creating New Performance Indicators
6. Performance Indicators Set Up Considerations
6 1. Averaging Percentages Problem
6.2. Changing indicator measurement intervals and past
target reporting problem
Performance indicators (PIs) are the measurement parameters that ultimately drive the Escendency system and contribute the quantitative measurements that allow the organisation's vision to be measured.
PIs are attached to the measurable items of the strategy map during the setup of performance targets. PI's can be attached to any number of performance targets provided those targets are not running concurrently at anytime during their duration.
Statutory performance indicators (e.g. BVPIs for local government) and local PI's (internal to the organisation) are the two default types that come with the system. These indicator types can be edited, deleted or added to in the PI Types module).
Escendency identifies the statutory PIs that relate to a specific organisation and pre-populates them into that organisation's Escendency system. Measurements and equations are also pre-populated for those PIs that are defined by a formula (see Equation Builder help on setting up, editing and using equations). Such PI's are prefixed with lower case 'e' for equation (e.g. eBV199a) and are all set up as snapshot and annual by default, whereas those not associated with a formula are prefixed with a lower case 's' for simple (e.g. sBV002a). An organisation can choose to use, edit, delete or ignore these pre-populated PIs.
Escendency maintains an upto date list of all client organisations' statutory PIs and will update a client's performance indicator table as this list is changed.
NOTE: Escendency makes no apologies for statutory performance indicators preloaded onto a client's system that cannot be defined as having a value that is good for performance when low, high, or in a range. This is because such "indicators" are not correctly defined by the statutory body involved and are not indicative of performance per se (examples from the Department of Communities and Local Government (DCLG) include BV016b: Percentage of Economically Active People who have a Disability, BV017b: Ethnic minority representation in the workforce – local population, and BV216a: Identifying Contaminated Land). For these situations Escendency recommends using "Range" as an option.
View a list of performance indicators, and manage individual performance indicators (figure 1).
Figure 1: Example of a performance indicator list window. Note: a new system may not have any PIs listed. PI's are listed alphabetically numerically by title.
Records are split up into pages. Click a page number link to view another page of records.
The number of your current page is highlighted in bold red text.
If there are a lot of pages, numbers will appear in a list that you can scroll along.
To change the number of records shown at a time, select a different number from the drop-down
list at the top of the page.
To delete a performance indicator, click the "delete" link next to the indicator. A popup message will appear asking to confirm deletion. Press "OK", and its status will change to "deleted".
Checking the "Show Deleted, Suspended, Pending" checkbox will cause the list of records to include these records along with those currently open. Leaving the checkbox blank will cause the list only to show records currently open.
Click "Add" to add a new indicator, or click an existing indicator to view/edit it (figure 2).

Figure 2: Example of the performance indicator Add/Edit window.
Note: if the performance indicator is already created and has performance target/s associated the indicator cannot be fully edited until:
Caution! When setting up a new performance indicator it is very important to pay attention to the parameters used. Once a performance indicator is actively attached to a target it becomes impossible for users to change many of the indicator's parameters, e.g. measurement interval, measurement type, current value type, and high/low/range all of which have a significant impact on the way a performance target is reported and assessed. This point cannot be over stressed.
3.1 Performance indicator fields
This button gives access to a list of perspective/indicator types that can assist with classification of the performance indicators (figure 3). The Escendency system comes with a default list of scorecard perspectives based on the BVPIs. These perspectives can be edited, deleted, added to in the Scorecard Perspectives module.

Figure 3: Example perspectives list to associate with a performance indicator. The example shows some additional perspectives to the Escendency defaults.
Select one or more perspective/indicator types, and press the "Save" button to save changes. Once back at the main edit window (figure 2) the user can save the changes made to the PI list (figure 1).
A new performance indicator can be created from scratch using the 'Add' button in the Performance Indicator list window (figure 1) or from an existing performance indicator by clicking the 'Save New' button in the Performance Indicator add/edit window (figure 2) provided the reference field has been changed. This is particularly useful for performance indicators that share identical field content. From release 3.10 perspectives from the original performance indicator are also copied over to the new one.
6.1 Averaging Percentage Problem
Caution should be used when setting up a performance indicator that is reporting an average percent:
Consider this example using DCLG's performance indicator BV82b(i): Percentage of Household waste composted. This example is particularly relevant because the values may vary signficantly seasonally (more compost in the 3rd quarter because of garden waste). If the measurement is taken quarterly we could have the following hypothetical values (in 1000 tonnes):
| 1st Quarter | 2nd Quarter | 3rd Quarter | 4th Quarter | Total Waste | |
| Waste composted | 20 | 30 | 65 | 10 | 125 |
| Total waste | 120 | 120 | 150 | 110 | 500 |
| Percent composted | 16.67 | 25 | 43.33 | 9.09 | 25.00 |
If the quarterly percentages are averaged, however, the value is not
25.00 but 23.52.
The situation above can best be resolved in two ways:
1. Using a simple indicator set to snapshot. The values entered each quarter
would be calculated from the sum of the previous values (i.e. from the example
above, 20/120, 50/240, 115/390 and 125/500) so that the reported values would
be the percentage of waste composted to date as opposed to per quarter.
2. Using an equation indicator, also set to snapshot, attached to an equation
comprising two summed measurements (tonnes of waste composted to-date and tonnes
of waste collected). Each quarterly calculation would in effect mimic example
1. but require less overhead.
6.2 Changing indicator measurement intervals and past target reporting problem
If the interval of an existing indicator is to be changed ensure that it has not been used for a previous performance target otherwise the graphs for that target will not display correctly. Use 'Save new' feature in the indicator edit page instead (you will need to change the reference field first) and create a new indicator and edit the measurement intervals accordingly. Rename so the two indicators can be told apart and attach to the new target as needed (you can still use the target wizard but ensure that you repoint to the indicator with the new interval in step 1).